Building on J.L. Austin’s work(read my article on Austin) I want to continue exploring action-oriented language by discussing John Searle’s Speech Act Theory. While Austin introduced the groundbreaking idea that language performs actions, Searle refined and expanded this concept by examining the rules that govern speech and its effects on the world.
John Searle (1932–), a renowned American philosopher of language, developed Speech Act Theory in the 1960s. His work demonstrates that language is not merely a tool for communication but a means of performing actions with real-world consequences.
The Core of Speech Act Theory
John Searle expanded on Austin’s ideas, offering a more rigorous framework. He argued that all speech acts involve three core components:
Locutionary Acts: These are the basic acts of saying something with a particular meaning. For example, uttering the sentence “I promise to be there” has a specific meaning that both the speaker and the listener understand.
Illocutionary Acts: These are the actions performed by saying something. When you say “I promise to be there,” you are not just conveying information; you are making a promise. The illocutionary act is the promise itself.
Perlocutionary Acts: These are the effects or consequences of the illocutionary act. For instance, the promise might reassure the listener or make them feel more secure.
Types of Speech Acts
Searle categorised speech acts into several types, each serving a different purpose:
Assertives: Statements that commit the speaker to the truth of the proposition (e.g., “The Earth is round”).
Directives: Attempts by the speaker to get the listener to do something (e.g., “Please close the door”).
Commissives: Commitments by the speaker to a future course of action (e.g., “I promise to help you”).
Expressives: Expressions of the speaker’s psychological state (e.g., “I apologise for being late”).
Declaratives: Speech acts that change the reality in accord with the propositional contents of the declaration (e.g., “I now pronounce you husband and wife”).
Comparing Austin and Searle
While Austin focused on the conditions that make performatives successful, Searle explored the rules that underlie all speech acts. This shift from context-specific conditions to universal principles marked a significant advance in the philosophy of language. Where Austin spoke of felicitous or infelicitous acts, Searle offered a taxonomy of acts with clear criteria for their classification.
The Impact of Speech Act Theory
Searle’s theory has had a profound impact on linguistics and pragmatics. It has helped us understand how language shapes our actions and reality. For instance, when a judge declares a defendant guilty, the words themselves change the legal status of the defendant. This illustrates how speech acts can have tangible, real-world effects.
In my next article, we will look even deeper into the world of Speech Acts, exploring how they continue to shape our understanding of language and action. Stay tuned!
©Antoine Decressac — 2024.
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases
Suggested Reading
For those interested in delving deeper into Searle’s Speech Act Theory, here are some recent and accessible publications:
“Speech Acts” by Geeta Kapur (2024). A valuable read as this book explores the intersection of language, art, and cultural criticism. Kapur’s work delves into how speech acts function within different cultural and historical contexts, offering insights into the power dynamics and subjectivities embedded in language.
“The Philosophy of Language” by Scott Soames (2022). Soames offers a comprehensive overview of contemporary philosophical debates, including a detailed section on Speech Act Theory.
“Pragmatics: An Introduction” by Yan Huang (2023)Huang’s book is an excellent introduction to pragmatics, with a chapter dedicated to Searle’s contributions and their relevance in modern linguistics.
“Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language” by John Searle (1969). This essay lays the foundational theory of how language functions as a tool for action. Searle’s work dissects the relationship between language and communication, explaining how utterances can perform actions and create social realities. This book is pivotal for understanding the practical and philosophical implications of language use in everyday interactions.